Logo 
Search:

Unix / Linux / Ubuntu Forum

Ask Question   UnAnswered
Home » Forum » Unix / Linux / Ubuntu       RSS Feeds

Stable 10.04

  Date: Jan 21    Category: Unix / Linux / Ubuntu    Views: 362
  

Although only three days gone bye, 10.04 on the desktop D: drive is very
stable and not freezing. Now its early days and I do not want to tempt
fate but if the removal of RAM did let Ubuntu work OK my logic thinking
tells me that while the MB may be happier, Ubuntu really could not
handle the extra RAM while XP had always loaded and been stable on the
C: drive with whatever I put in those chip slots.

Oh dear just got to that point typing this message I moved the mouse and
it crashed. Fate !!!!

Now I was going to say shall we tell the world, but after that crash I
think its back to the drawing board.

Share: 

 

8 Answers Found

 
Answer #1    Answered On: Jan 21    

Interesting that you got a crash using 10.04 which you said worked
perfectly well before and it was 10.10 that that had the problems, or
was that a typo ??

Also interesting that changing the memory sticks gave *some* sort of
improvement but what does Ubuntu and WinXP say about the memory you
have installed now ?

BTW - did some more reading on the Dimension 2400 and whereas Dell say
that the slots can take up to 512Mb sticks, there are only 2 slots but
in the next paragraph they say maximum RAM is 2Gb, how that's supposed
to work is anybody's guess so there's a muck up somewhere. Also there
are comments about getting 1Gb sticks working or not so there seems to
be some sort of issue going above 512Mb per slot.

I'd be inclined to run with one memory stick at a time and see how it
goes regarding stability - you may find that some modules give lockups
and some don't. If so then memory timing differences may be throwing
Ubuntu into a spin whereas WinXP doesn't drive the memory as hard ?

To throw another item into the mix, the Dimension 2400 was made when
the infamous 'bad capacitor plague' was around so have you checked for
leaking electrolytic capacitors on the board ?

 
Answer #2    Answered On: Jan 21    

No I tried 10.10 upgrade from 10.04 but reverted to 10.04 because 10.10
did not improve things.

It 10.04 that we have and are talking about now.


XP was happy with the 2gb but 10.04 is not or is it something else.

XP read the 2gb and now reads the 1gb.

10.04

mem Total 495 Used 386 free 109 buffers 15 cache 214

Will try the one stick, am up for any answer now.

Capacitors are I believe OK.

 
Answer #3    Answered On: Jan 21    

Looks like Ubuntu is only reading one memory stick and not all of it
either !! As well as trying one stick of RAM try using it in each slot
to see if one of them isn't being detected correctly. That might be
the root cause at long last but if it is it's not clear how to go
about sorting it, if it even can be !

 
Answer #4    Answered On: Jan 21    

You and me have to accept this is an older computer. I get them given to
me. I give the best to deserving causes. Perhaps I will keep a good one
myself next time.

I've been called worse right here on this list so am with you on that.

 
Answer #5    Answered On: Jan 21    

if the capacitor is bulging on the top or you can see a crack then its faulty

100% Microsoft free zone.


 
Answer #6    Answered On: Jan 21    

Yes as you say that is one way to tell.

 
Answer #7    Answered On: Jan 21    

Are the memory contacts clean? If changing memory helped a
little, perhaps the contacts are tarnished. This will cause memory/computer to
act squirrelly.

 
Answer #8    Answered On: Jan 21    

I have been repairing and building computers for many years so seldom miss out on those tasks.

 
Didn't find what you were looking for? Find more on Stable 10.04 Or get search suggestion and latest updates.




Tagged: